QRunIO/qqq
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Kingsrook/qqq.git synced 2025-07-17 20:50:44 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

make sure join-name-chain for record locks ends at the expected join table

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
darin.kelkhoff
2024-04-18 20:44:38 -05:00
parent 09fb9a9502
commit 974b90f0b7
2 changed files with 8 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/instances/QInstanceValidator.java
View File

@ -749,6 +749,10 @@ public class QInstanceValidator
{
if(assertCondition(CollectionUtils.nullSafeHasContents(recordSecurityLock.getJoinNameChain()), prefix + "field name " + fieldName + " looks like a join (has a dot), but no joinNameChain was given."))
{
String[] split = fieldName.split("\\.");
String joinTableName = split[0];
String joinFieldName = split[1];
List<QueryJoin> joins = new ArrayList<>();
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
@ -790,6 +794,8 @@ public class QInstanceValidator
}
}
assertCondition(Objects.equals(tmpTable.getName(), joinTableName), prefix + "has a joinNameChain doesn't end in the expected table [" + joinTableName + "]");
assertCondition(findField(qInstance, table, joins, fieldName), prefix + "has an unrecognized fieldName: " + fieldName);
}
}

3
qqq-backend-core/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/instances/QInstanceValidatorTest.java
View File

@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.code.QCodeReference;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.code.QCodeType;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.dashboard.ParentWidgetMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.fields.AdornmentType;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.fields.DateTimeDisplayValueBehavior;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.fields.FieldAdornment;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.fields.QFieldMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.fields.QFieldType;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.fields.DateTimeDisplayValueBehavior;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.fields.ValueTooLongBehavior;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.joins.JoinOn;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.joins.JoinType;
@ -1902,6 +1902,7 @@ public class QInstanceValidatorTest extends BaseTest
assertValidationFailureReasons((qInstance -> lockExtractor.apply(qInstance).setJoinNameChain(new ArrayList<>())), "looks like a join (has a dot), but no joinNameChain was given");
assertValidationFailureReasons((qInstance -> lockExtractor.apply(qInstance).setFieldName("storeId")), "does not look like a join (does not have a dot), but a joinNameChain was given");
assertValidationFailureReasons((qInstance -> lockExtractor.apply(qInstance).setFieldName("order.wrongId")), "unrecognized fieldName: order.wrongId");
assertValidationFailureReasons((qInstance -> lockExtractor.apply(qInstance).setFieldName("lineItem.id")), "joinNameChain doesn't end in the expected table [lineItem]");
assertValidationFailureReasons((qInstance -> lockExtractor.apply(qInstance).setJoinNameChain(List.of("notAJoin"))), "an unrecognized join");
assertValidationFailureReasons((qInstance -> lockExtractor.apply(qInstance).setJoinNameChain(List.of("orderLineItem"))), "joinNameChain could not be followed through join");
}