Revert "QQQ-21: Updates due to backend core changes"

This reverts commit 0f2766283e.
This commit is contained in:
Tim Chamberlain
2022-07-06 16:26:30 -05:00
parent 0f2766283e
commit ed27a192e8
2 changed files with 15 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeAll;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertFalse;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotEquals;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotNull;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;
@ -117,23 +116,15 @@ class QJavalinImplementationTest
assertEquals(200, response.getStatus());
JSONObject jsonObject = JsonUtils.toJSONObject(response.getBody());
assertEquals(1, jsonObject.keySet().size(), "Number of top-level keys");
JSONObject table = jsonObject.getJSONObject("table");
assertEquals(4, table.keySet().size(), "Number of mid-level keys");
assertEquals("person", table.getString("name"));
assertEquals("Person", table.getString("label"));
assertEquals("id", table.getString("primaryKeyField"));
JSONObject fields = table.getJSONObject("fields");
JSONObject idField = fields.getJSONObject("id");
assertEquals("id", idField.getString("name"));
assertEquals("INTEGER", idField.getString("type"));
JSONObject firstNameField = fields.getJSONObject("firstName");
assertTrue(firstNameField.getBoolean("isRequired"), "First name is required");
JSONObject birthDateField = fields.getJSONObject("birthDate");
assertFalse(birthDateField.getBoolean("isRequired"), "Birth date is not required");
JSONObject field0 = fields.getJSONObject("id");
assertEquals("id", field0.getString("name"));
assertEquals("INTEGER", field0.getString("type"));
}

View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ package com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.javalin;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.util.List;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.interfaces.mock.MockBackendStep;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.interfaces.mock.MockFunctionBody;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QAuthenticationMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QCodeReference;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QCodeType;
@ -34,14 +34,16 @@ import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QFieldMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QFieldType;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QInstance;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QTableMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QBackendStepMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QFunctionInputMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QFunctionMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QFunctionOutputMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QOutputView;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QProcessMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QRecordListMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QRecordListView;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.module.rdbms.model.metadata.RDBMSBackendMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.module.rdbms.jdbc.ConnectionManager;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.module.rdbms.jdbc.QueryManager;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.module.rdbms.model.metadata.RDBMSBackendMetaData;
import org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils;
import static junit.framework.Assert.assertNotNull;
@ -149,8 +151,8 @@ public class TestUtils
.withField(new QFieldMetaData("id", QFieldType.INTEGER))
.withField(new QFieldMetaData("createDate", QFieldType.DATE_TIME).withBackendName("create_date"))
.withField(new QFieldMetaData("modifyDate", QFieldType.DATE_TIME).withBackendName("modify_date"))
.withField(new QFieldMetaData("firstName", QFieldType.STRING).withBackendName("first_name").withIsRequired(true))
.withField(new QFieldMetaData("lastName", QFieldType.STRING).withBackendName("last_name").withIsRequired(true))
.withField(new QFieldMetaData("firstName", QFieldType.STRING).withBackendName("first_name"))
.withField(new QFieldMetaData("lastName", QFieldType.STRING).withBackendName("last_name"))
.withField(new QFieldMetaData("birthDate", QFieldType.DATE).withBackendName("birth_date"))
.withField(new QFieldMetaData("email", QFieldType.STRING));
}
@ -165,10 +167,10 @@ public class TestUtils
return new QProcessMetaData()
.withName("greet")
.withTableName("person")
.addStep(new QBackendStepMetaData()
.addFunction(new QFunctionMetaData()
.withName("prepare")
.withCode(new QCodeReference()
.withName(MockBackendStep.class.getName())
.withName(MockFunctionBody.class.getName())
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA)
.withCodeUsage(QCodeUsage.FUNCTION)) // todo - needed, or implied in this context?
.withInputData(new QFunctionInputMetaData()
@ -183,6 +185,9 @@ public class TestUtils
.addField(new QFieldMetaData("fullGreeting", QFieldType.STRING))
)
.withFieldList(List.of(new QFieldMetaData("outputMessage", QFieldType.STRING))))
.withOutputView(new QOutputView()
.withMessageField("outputMessage")
.withRecordListView(new QRecordListView().withFieldNames(List.of("id", "firstName", "lastName", "fullGreeting"))))
);
}