QRunIO/qqq
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Kingsrook/qqq.git synced 2025-07-18 13:10:44 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix test for step without name (enricher now handles)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
darin.kelkhoff
2023-02-24 17:03:56 -06:00
parent 8a8f0d6e6f
commit ea731bac5c
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
qqq-backend-core/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/instances/QInstanceValidatorTest.java
View File

@ -347,11 +347,11 @@ class QInstanceValidatorTest extends BaseTest
@Test
public void test_validateProcessStepWithEmptyName()
{
assertValidationFailureReasons((qInstance) -> qInstance.getProcess(TestUtils.PROCESS_NAME_GREET_PEOPLE).getStepList().get(0).setName(""),
"Missing name for a step");
assertValidationFailureReasons((qInstance) -> qInstance.getProcess(TestUtils.PROCESS_NAME_GREET_PEOPLE_INTERACTIVE).getStepList().get(1).setName(null),
"Missing name for a step");
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// these used to be an assertion failure - but enricher now sets a default name for backend steps w/ a code name //
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
assertValidationSuccess((qInstance) -> qInstance.getProcess(TestUtils.PROCESS_NAME_GREET_PEOPLE).getStepList().get(0).setName(""));
assertValidationSuccess((qInstance) -> qInstance.getProcess(TestUtils.PROCESS_NAME_GREET_PEOPLE_INTERACTIVE).getStepList().get(1).setName(null));
}