QRunIO/qqq
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Kingsrook/qqq.git synced 2025-07-17 20:50:44 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

A little more flexibility in filter validation, for context w/o a joinContext

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
darin.kelkhoff
2025-02-24 14:25:30 -06:00
parent a0d12eade7
commit b984959aa7
1 changed files with 32 additions and 9 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

41
qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/instances/QInstanceValidator.java
View File

@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ public class QInstanceValidator
private static ListingHash<Class<?>, QInstanceValidatorPluginInterface<?>> validatorPlugins = new ListingHash<>();
private JoinGraph joinGraph = null;
private List<String> errors = new ArrayList<>();
@ -169,8 +171,7 @@ public class QInstanceValidator
// the enricher will build a join graph (if there are any joins). we'd like to only do that //
// once, during the enrichment/validation work, so, capture it, and store it back in the instance. //
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
JoinGraph joinGraph = null;
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
try
{
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
@ -179,7 +180,7 @@ public class QInstanceValidator
// TODO - possible point of customization (use a different enricher, or none, or pass it options).
QInstanceEnricher qInstanceEnricher = new QInstanceEnricher(qInstance);
qInstanceEnricher.enrich();
joinGraph = qInstanceEnricher.getJoinGraph();
this.joinGraph = qInstanceEnricher.getJoinGraph();
}
catch(Exception e)
{
@ -1949,7 +1950,8 @@ public class QInstanceValidator
{
if(fieldName.contains("."))
{
String fieldNameAfterDot = fieldName.substring(fieldName.lastIndexOf(".") + 1);
String fieldNameAfterDot = fieldName.substring(fieldName.lastIndexOf(".") + 1);
String tableNameBeforeDot = fieldName.substring(0, fieldName.lastIndexOf("."));
if(CollectionUtils.nullSafeHasContents(queryJoins))
{
@ -1973,11 +1975,32 @@ public class QInstanceValidator
}
else
{
errors.add("QInstanceValidator does not yet support finding a field that looks like a join field, but isn't associated with a query.");
return (true);
// todo! for(QJoinMetaData join : CollectionUtils.nonNullMap(qInstance.getJoins()).values())
// {
// }
if(this.joinGraph != null)
{
Set<JoinGraph.JoinConnectionList> joinConnections = joinGraph.getJoinConnections(table.getName());
for(JoinGraph.JoinConnectionList joinConnectionList : joinConnections)
{
JoinGraph.JoinConnection joinConnection = joinConnectionList.list().get(joinConnectionList.list().size() - 1);
if(tableNameBeforeDot.equals(joinConnection.joinTable()))
{
QTableMetaData joinTable = qInstance.getTable(tableNameBeforeDot);
if(joinTable.getFields().containsKey(fieldNameAfterDot))
{
/////////////////////////
// mmm, looks valid... //
/////////////////////////
return (true);
}
}
}
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// todo - not sure how vulnerable we are to ongoing issues here... //
// idea: let a filter (or any object?) be opted out of validation, some version of //
// a static map of objects we can check at the top of various validate methods... //
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
errors.add("Failed to find field named: " + fieldName);
}
}
}