diff --git a/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/ExecuteCodeAction.java b/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/ExecuteCodeAction.java
index 09f6ebba..c142fc1f 100644
--- a/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/ExecuteCodeAction.java
+++ b/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/ExecuteCodeAction.java
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ public class ExecuteCodeAction
       executeCodeInput.setCodeReference(new QCodeReference().withInlineCode(scriptRevision.getContents()).withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA_SCRIPT)); // todo - code type as attribute of script!!
 
       ExecuteCodeAction.addApiUtilityToContext(context, scriptRevision);
+      context.put("qqq", new QqqScriptUtils());
       ExecuteCodeAction.setExecutionLoggerInExecuteCodeInput(input, scriptRevision, executeCodeInput);
 
       return (executeCodeInput);
diff --git a/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/ScriptApi.java b/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/QqqScriptUtils.java
similarity index 95%
rename from qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/ScriptApi.java
rename to qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/QqqScriptUtils.java
index fa2f7154..f34b420a 100644
--- a/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/ScriptApi.java
+++ b/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/QqqScriptUtils.java
@@ -49,11 +49,15 @@ import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.tables.QTableMetaData;
  ** etc, plus object constructors).
  **
  ** Before scripts knew about the API, this class made sense and was used.
- ** But, now that scripts do know about the API, it feels like this class could
+ ** But, when scripts gained knowledge of the API, then it felt like this class could
  ** be deleted... but, what about, a QQQ deployment without the API module...
  ** In that case, we might still want this class... think about it.
+ **
+ ** And/Or - it turns out - sometimes using QQQ directly is "better" (?) than using
+ ** an api - so - this object may be available for other use cases (e.g., getting
+ ** a record's backendDetails (e.g., for full json from a source backend api)).
  *******************************************************************************/
-public class ScriptApi implements Serializable
+public class QqqScriptUtils implements Serializable
 {
 
    /*******************************************************************************
diff --git a/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/TestScriptActionInterface.java b/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/TestScriptActionInterface.java
index 92499b87..f665cf12 100644
--- a/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/TestScriptActionInterface.java
+++ b/qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/TestScriptActionInterface.java
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ public interface TestScriptActionInterface
     *******************************************************************************/
    default void execute(TestScriptInput input, TestScriptOutput output) throws QException
    {
+      /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+      // todo - could this be merged with the various other script runners, to use ExecuteCodeAction.setupExecuteCodeInput?? //
+      /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
       ExecuteCodeInput executeCodeInput = new ExecuteCodeInput();
       executeCodeInput.setContext(new HashMap<>());
 
diff --git a/qqq-backend-core/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/ScriptApiTest.java b/qqq-backend-core/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/QqqScriptUtilsTest.java
similarity index 97%
rename from qqq-backend-core/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/ScriptApiTest.java
rename to qqq-backend-core/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/QqqScriptUtilsTest.java
index a2208185..3758b3d5 100644
--- a/qqq-backend-core/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/ScriptApiTest.java
+++ b/qqq-backend-core/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/scripts/QqqScriptUtilsTest.java
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
 /*******************************************************************************
  ** Unit test for com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.actions.scripts.ScriptApi
  *******************************************************************************/
-class ScriptApiTest extends BaseTest
+class QqqScriptUtilsTest extends BaseTest
 {
 
    /*******************************************************************************
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ class ScriptApiTest extends BaseTest
    @Test
    void test() throws QException
    {
-      ScriptApi api = new ScriptApi();
+      QqqScriptUtils api = new QqqScriptUtils();
       assertThat(api.newFilterCriteria()).isInstanceOf(QFilterCriteria.class);
       assertThat(api.newFilterOrderBy()).isInstanceOf(QFilterOrderBy.class);
       assertThat(api.newQueryFilter()).isInstanceOf(QQueryFilter.class);