QRunIO/qqq
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Kingsrook/qqq.git synced 2025-07-18 05:01:07 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

CE-882 add filterForWriteLockTree

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
darin.kelkhoff
2024-04-26 10:54:34 -05:00
parent 3765f6351c
commit 7e27c7a89a
1 changed files with 26 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

27
qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/model/metadata/security/RecordSecurityLockFilters.java
View File

@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ package com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.security;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
/*******************************************************************************
@ -50,12 +51,36 @@ public class RecordSecurityLockFilters
** filter a list of locks so that we only see the ones that apply to reads.
*******************************************************************************/
public static MultiRecordSecurityLock filterForReadLockTree(List<RecordSecurityLock> recordSecurityLocks)
{
return filterForLockTree(recordSecurityLocks, Set.of(RecordSecurityLock.LockScope.READ_AND_WRITE));
}
/*******************************************************************************
** filter a list of locks so that we only see the ones that apply to writes.
*******************************************************************************/
public static MultiRecordSecurityLock filterForWriteLockTree(List<RecordSecurityLock> recordSecurityLocks)
{
return filterForLockTree(recordSecurityLocks, Set.of(RecordSecurityLock.LockScope.READ_AND_WRITE, RecordSecurityLock.LockScope.WRITE));
}
/*******************************************************************************
** filter a list of locks so that we only see the ones that apply to any of the
** input set of scopes.
*******************************************************************************/
private static MultiRecordSecurityLock filterForLockTree(List<RecordSecurityLock> recordSecurityLocks, Set<RecordSecurityLock.LockScope> allowedScopes)
{
if(recordSecurityLocks == null)
{
return (null);
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// at the top-level we build a multi-lock with AND operator //
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
MultiRecordSecurityLock result = new MultiRecordSecurityLock();
result.setOperator(MultiRecordSecurityLock.BooleanOperator.AND);
@ -69,7 +94,7 @@ public class RecordSecurityLockFilters
}
else
{
if(RecordSecurityLock.LockScope.READ_AND_WRITE.equals(recordSecurityLock.getLockScope()))
if(allowedScopes.contains(recordSecurityLock.getLockScope()))
{
result.withLock(recordSecurityLock);
}