QRunIO/qqq
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Kingsrook/qqq.git synced 2025-07-21 06:28:44 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

CE-1654 - Just log, don't throw, if missing a security key value (should this be a setting??)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
darin.kelkhoff
2024-09-10 09:34:46 -05:00
parent f457fd0860
commit 3cc0cfd86c
2 changed files with 55 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/actions/audits/AuditAction.java
View File

@ -225,7 +225,13 @@ public class AuditAction extends AbstractQActionFunction<AuditInput, AuditOutput
{
if(auditSingleInput.getSecurityKeyValues() == null || !auditSingleInput.getSecurityKeyValues().containsKey(recordSecurityLock.getSecurityKeyType()))
{
throw (new QException("Missing securityKeyValue [" + recordSecurityLock.getSecurityKeyType() + "] in audit request for table " + auditSingleInput.getAuditTableName()));
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// originally, this case threw... //
// but i think it's better to record the audit, just //
// missing its security key value, then to fail... //
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// throw (new QException("Missing securityKeyValue [" + recordSecurityLock.getSecurityKeyType() + "] in audit request for table " + auditSingleInput.getAuditTableName()));
LOG.info("Missing securityKeyValue in audit request", logPair("table", auditSingleInput.getAuditTableName()), logPair("securityKey", recordSecurityLock.getSecurityKeyType()));
}
}