diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
index 97f340c8..df34a224 100644
--- a/pom.xml
+++ b/pom.xml
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
       <dependency>
          <groupId>com.kingsrook.qqq</groupId>
          <artifactId>qqq-backend-core</artifactId>
-         <version>0.0.0</version>
+         <version>0.1.0-20220706.184937-2</version>
       </dependency>
       <dependency>
          <groupId>com.kingsrook.qqq</groupId>
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/frontend/picocli/TestUtils.java b/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/frontend/picocli/TestUtils.java
index 7940bbcc..925b2cb8 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/frontend/picocli/TestUtils.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/frontend/picocli/TestUtils.java
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ package com.kingsrook.qqq.frontend.picocli;
 import java.io.InputStream;
 import java.sql.Connection;
 import java.util.List;
-import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.interfaces.mock.MockFunctionBody;
+import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.interfaces.mock.MockBackendStep;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QAuthenticationMetaData;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QCodeReference;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QCodeType;
@@ -34,16 +34,14 @@ import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QFieldMetaData;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QFieldType;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QInstance;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QTableMetaData;
+import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QBackendStepMetaData;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QFunctionInputMetaData;
-import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QFunctionMetaData;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QFunctionOutputMetaData;
-import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QOutputView;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QProcessMetaData;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QRecordListMetaData;
-import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.processes.QRecordListView;
-import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.module.rdbms.model.metadata.RDBMSBackendMetaData;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.module.rdbms.jdbc.ConnectionManager;
 import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.module.rdbms.jdbc.QueryManager;
+import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.module.rdbms.model.metadata.RDBMSBackendMetaData;
 import org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils;
 import static junit.framework.Assert.assertNotNull;
 
@@ -166,10 +164,10 @@ public class TestUtils
       return new QProcessMetaData()
          .withName("greet")
          .withTableName("person")
-         .addFunction(new QFunctionMetaData()
+         .addStep(new QBackendStepMetaData()
             .withName("prepare")
             .withCode(new QCodeReference()
-               .withName(MockFunctionBody.class.getName())
+               .withName(MockBackendStep.class.getName())
                .withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA)
                .withCodeUsage(QCodeUsage.FUNCTION)) // todo - needed, or implied in this context?
             .withInputData(new QFunctionInputMetaData()
@@ -184,9 +182,6 @@ public class TestUtils
                   .addField(new QFieldMetaData("fullGreeting", QFieldType.STRING))
                )
                .withFieldList(List.of(new QFieldMetaData("outputMessage", QFieldType.STRING))))
-            .withOutputView(new QOutputView()
-               .withMessageField("outputMessage")
-               .withRecordListView(new QRecordListView().withFieldNames(List.of("id", "firstName", "lastName", "fullGreeting"))))
          );
    }