QRunIO/qqq
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Kingsrook/qqq.git synced 2025-07-21 06:28:44 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update to support both JSON and multipart form bodies for create and update.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
darin.kelkhoff
2023-05-30 11:13:20 -05:00
parent a75530b466
commit 364e9f420b
2 changed files with 118 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

40
qqq-middleware-javalin/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/javalin/QJavalinImplementation.java
View File

@ -654,6 +654,46 @@ public class QJavalinImplementation
*******************************************************************************/
private static void setRecordValuesForInsertOrUpdate(Context context, QTableMetaData tableMetaData, QRecord record) throws IOException
{
String contentType = Objects.requireNonNullElse(context.header("content-type"), "");
boolean isContentTypeJson = contentType.toLowerCase().contains("json");
try
{
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// if the caller said they've sent JSON, or if they didn't supply a content-type, then try to read the body //
// as JSON. if it throws, we'll continue by trying to read form params, but if it succeeds, we'll return. //
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
if(isContentTypeJson || !StringUtils.hasContent(contentType))
{
Map<?, ?> map = context.bodyAsClass(Map.class);
for(Map.Entry<?, ?> entry : map.entrySet())
{
String fieldName = ValueUtils.getValueAsString(entry.getKey());
Object value = entry.getValue();
if(StringUtils.hasContent(String.valueOf(value)))
{
record.setValue(fieldName, (Serializable) value);
}
else if("".equals(value))
{
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// if frontend sent us an empty string - put a null in the record's value map. //
// this could potentially be changed to be type-specific (e.g., store an empty-string for STRING //
// fields, but null for INTEGER, etc) - but, who really wants empty-string in database anyway? //
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
record.setValue(fieldName, null);
}
}
return;
}
}
catch(Exception e)
{
LOG.info("Error trying to read body as map", e, logPair("contentType", contentType));
}
/////////////////////////
// process form params //
/////////////////////////