QRunIO/qqq
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Kingsrook/qqq.git synced 2025-07-18 05:01:07 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Enrich apps before tables - fixed a situation where a table's possible-value field wasn't getting set up as LINK adornment, due to table not being put in app's child-list, which enrichment does, so, if we enrich app first, it fixed it

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
darin.kelkhoff
2024-06-27 11:52:51 -05:00
parent b24a990043
commit 18c94943cb
1 changed files with 12 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
qqq-backend-core/src/main/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/core/instances/QInstanceEnricher.java
View File

@ -123,6 +123,18 @@ public class QInstanceEnricher
*******************************************************************************/
public void enrich()
{
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// at one point, we did apps later - but - it was possible to put tables in an app's //
// sections, but not its children list (enrichApp fixes this by adding such tables to //
// the children list) so then when enrichTable runs, it looks for fields that are //
// possible-values pointed at tables, for adding LINK adornments - and that could //
// cause such links to be omitted, mysteriously! so, do app enrichment before tables. //
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
if(qInstance.getApps() != null)
{
qInstance.getApps().values().forEach(this::enrichApp);
}
if(qInstance.getTables() != null)
{
qInstance.getTables().values().forEach(this::enrichTable);
@ -139,11 +151,6 @@ public class QInstanceEnricher
qInstance.getBackends().values().forEach(this::enrichBackend);
}
if(qInstance.getApps() != null)
{
qInstance.getApps().values().forEach(this::enrichApp);
}
if(qInstance.getReports() != null)
{
qInstance.getReports().values().forEach(this::enrichReport);