mirror of
https://github.com/Kingsrook/qqq.git
synced 2025-07-18 13:10:44 +00:00
Refactor to get rid of Usage parameter in QCodeReference
This commit is contained in:
@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QInstance;
|
||||
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.authentication.QAuthenticationMetaData;
|
||||
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.code.QCodeReference;
|
||||
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.code.QCodeType;
|
||||
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.code.QCodeUsage;
|
||||
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.dashboard.QWidgetMetaData;
|
||||
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.fields.QFieldMetaData;
|
||||
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.fields.QFieldType;
|
||||
@ -174,7 +173,7 @@ public class TestUtils
|
||||
{
|
||||
qInstance.addWidget(new QWidgetMetaData()
|
||||
.withName(PersonsByCreateDateBarChart.class.getSimpleName())
|
||||
.withCodeReference(new QCodeReference(PersonsByCreateDateBarChart.class, null)));
|
||||
.withCodeReference(new QCodeReference(PersonsByCreateDateBarChart.class)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -248,7 +247,7 @@ public class TestUtils
|
||||
.withAssociatedScript(new AssociatedScript()
|
||||
.withFieldName("testScriptId")
|
||||
.withScriptTypeId(1)
|
||||
.withScriptTester(new QCodeReference(TestScriptAction.class, QCodeUsage.SCRIPT_TESTER)));
|
||||
.withScriptTester(new QCodeReference(TestScriptAction.class)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -280,8 +279,7 @@ public class TestUtils
|
||||
.withName("prepare")
|
||||
.withCode(new QCodeReference()
|
||||
.withName(MockBackendStep.class.getName())
|
||||
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA)
|
||||
.withCodeUsage(QCodeUsage.BACKEND_STEP)) // todo - needed, or implied in this context?
|
||||
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA))
|
||||
.withInputData(new QFunctionInputMetaData()
|
||||
.withRecordListMetaData(new QRecordListMetaData().withTableName(TABLE_NAME_PERSON))
|
||||
.withFieldList(List.of(
|
||||
@ -319,8 +317,7 @@ public class TestUtils
|
||||
.withName("doWork")
|
||||
.withCode(new QCodeReference()
|
||||
.withName(MockBackendStep.class.getName())
|
||||
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA)
|
||||
.withCodeUsage(QCodeUsage.BACKEND_STEP)) // todo - needed, or implied in this context?
|
||||
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA))
|
||||
.withInputData(new QFunctionInputMetaData()
|
||||
.withRecordListMetaData(new QRecordListMetaData().withTableName(TABLE_NAME_PERSON))
|
||||
.withFieldList(List.of(
|
||||
@ -441,8 +438,7 @@ public class TestUtils
|
||||
.withName(STEP_NAME_SLEEPER)
|
||||
.withCode(new QCodeReference()
|
||||
.withName(SleeperStep.class.getName())
|
||||
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA)
|
||||
.withCodeUsage(QCodeUsage.BACKEND_STEP))
|
||||
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA))
|
||||
.withInputData(new QFunctionInputMetaData()
|
||||
.addField(new QFieldMetaData(SleeperStep.FIELD_SLEEP_MILLIS, QFieldType.INTEGER))));
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -499,8 +495,7 @@ public class TestUtils
|
||||
.withName(STEP_NAME_THROWER)
|
||||
.withCode(new QCodeReference()
|
||||
.withName(ThrowerStep.class.getName())
|
||||
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA)
|
||||
.withCodeUsage(QCodeUsage.BACKEND_STEP))
|
||||
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA))
|
||||
.withInputData(new QFunctionInputMetaData()
|
||||
.addField(new QFieldMetaData(ThrowerStep.FIELD_SLEEP_MILLIS, QFieldType.INTEGER))));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user