QRunIO/qqq
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Kingsrook/qqq.git synced 2025-07-17 20:50:44 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Refactor to get rid of Usage parameter in QCodeReference

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
darin.kelkhoff
2023-05-05 16:59:36 -05:00
parent cc765c66d6
commit 036b7dc115
27 changed files with 72 additions and 205 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
qqq-middleware-javalin/src/test/java/com/kingsrook/qqq/backend/javalin/TestUtils.java
View File

@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.QInstance;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.authentication.QAuthenticationMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.code.QCodeReference;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.code.QCodeType;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.code.QCodeUsage;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.dashboard.QWidgetMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.fields.QFieldMetaData;
import com.kingsrook.qqq.backend.core.model.metadata.fields.QFieldType;
@ -174,7 +173,7 @@ public class TestUtils
{
qInstance.addWidget(new QWidgetMetaData()
.withName(PersonsByCreateDateBarChart.class.getSimpleName())
.withCodeReference(new QCodeReference(PersonsByCreateDateBarChart.class, null)));
.withCodeReference(new QCodeReference(PersonsByCreateDateBarChart.class)));
}
@ -248,7 +247,7 @@ public class TestUtils
.withAssociatedScript(new AssociatedScript()
.withFieldName("testScriptId")
.withScriptTypeId(1)
.withScriptTester(new QCodeReference(TestScriptAction.class, QCodeUsage.SCRIPT_TESTER)));
.withScriptTester(new QCodeReference(TestScriptAction.class)));
}
@ -280,8 +279,7 @@ public class TestUtils
.withName("prepare")
.withCode(new QCodeReference()
.withName(MockBackendStep.class.getName())
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA)
.withCodeUsage(QCodeUsage.BACKEND_STEP)) // todo - needed, or implied in this context?
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA))
.withInputData(new QFunctionInputMetaData()
.withRecordListMetaData(new QRecordListMetaData().withTableName(TABLE_NAME_PERSON))
.withFieldList(List.of(
@ -319,8 +317,7 @@ public class TestUtils
.withName("doWork")
.withCode(new QCodeReference()
.withName(MockBackendStep.class.getName())
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA)
.withCodeUsage(QCodeUsage.BACKEND_STEP)) // todo - needed, or implied in this context?
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA))
.withInputData(new QFunctionInputMetaData()
.withRecordListMetaData(new QRecordListMetaData().withTableName(TABLE_NAME_PERSON))
.withFieldList(List.of(
@ -441,8 +438,7 @@ public class TestUtils
.withName(STEP_NAME_SLEEPER)
.withCode(new QCodeReference()
.withName(SleeperStep.class.getName())
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA)
.withCodeUsage(QCodeUsage.BACKEND_STEP))
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA))
.withInputData(new QFunctionInputMetaData()
.addField(new QFieldMetaData(SleeperStep.FIELD_SLEEP_MILLIS, QFieldType.INTEGER))));
}
@ -499,8 +495,7 @@ public class TestUtils
.withName(STEP_NAME_THROWER)
.withCode(new QCodeReference()
.withName(ThrowerStep.class.getName())
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA)
.withCodeUsage(QCodeUsage.BACKEND_STEP))
.withCodeType(QCodeType.JAVA))
.withInputData(new QFunctionInputMetaData()
.addField(new QFieldMetaData(ThrowerStep.FIELD_SLEEP_MILLIS, QFieldType.INTEGER))));
}